Re: Review of Large-Format Inkjet Contract Proofers
Re: Review of Large-Format Inkjet Contract Proofers
- Subject: Re: Review of Large-Format Inkjet Contract Proofers
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 08:41:12 -0600
on 5/7/03 8:26 AM, DS wrote:
>
- Terry Wyse's vote is for the UC inks.
>
"All I can say is that with UC inks, I'll get a
>
profile "out-of-the-box" that's either very good or
>
may require 1 round of editing.... With photo dye
>
inks, it would take 2-3 profile edits to get the
>
overall color matching that I'd get with my first UC
>
profile."
I'm in Terry's camp. No issues at all doing very accurate cross simulation
using UC inks. The big benefit I see is super fast dry down and stability.
The Dye based inks were always a problem because the print never appeared
the same out of the printer, an hour latter and even a day latter. Who wants
to wait for a print to "dry down" when doing proofing? Doing profile tuning
on dye based inks was a huge hassle since you had to tune for the appearance
at what point, out of the unit or a day latter?
Andrew Rodney
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.