Epson 9600 MatteBlack FW 10.2.6 vs 9.2.2
Epson 9600 MatteBlack FW 10.2.6 vs 9.2.2
- Subject: Epson 9600 MatteBlack FW 10.2.6 vs 9.2.2
- From: "Michael Lithgow from Colourhead" <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 17:56:59 +1000
- Organization: Colourhead Digital Colour Management Services
David Miller <email@hidden> wrote
>
Something interesting happened in printing a client's image with the
>
Epson 9600, mattle black ink, latest Epson OS X driver, in 10.2.6.
>
This was the first client job I printed using the newest OS X Epson
>
driver Jaguar, and the results were terrible. Drab. No life. Dreary.
>
Unsaleable.
>
Printed same image in OS 9.2.2 with FW, got perfect print.
>
I used the custom icc profile for the ink set, printer, and Epson
>
Enhanced Matte paper, that I created using OS 9.2.2, for both tries.
>
Is it possible I need to create a new custom under OS 10.2.6 with the
>
new Epson driver? Doesn't make sense to do this though. I
>
profiled the the printer, not the driver.
>
I also have the latest firmware update.
>
Anyone else have this happen? Any thoughts?
If you are talking RGB, then the media setting in the driver, controls
linearization, ink limits etc. If
Epson has revised the settings in the media settings in this version of
the driver then I would quite believe that the old profile would not
work well. How well would depend on the amount of change in the media
setting from the previous driver. While you certainly did profile the
printer, you did so via the driver and it's
settings/limits.
Michael Lithgow
Colourhead Digital Colour Management Services
Glen Waverley
Vic. 3150
Australia
Ph/Fax (03) 9511 5031
Mobile 0425 719413
email@hidden
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.483 / Virus Database: 279 - Release Date: 19/05/2003
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.