Re: Photographer needs monitor recommendations
Re: Photographer needs monitor recommendations
- Subject: Re: Photographer needs monitor recommendations
- From: email@hidden
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:44:05 EST
In a message dated 11/20/03 10:02:46 AM, email@hidden writes:
>
I figured the "science" wasn't all it was cracked up to be. It was
>
interesting to see (and with a more reasonable calculation using deltaE 94),
>
it's pretty decent. And we're using an average of 99 color readings. So this
>
entire experiment may be totally off kilter and not worth even
>
investigating. It would have been easier (and perhaps more useful) if I
>
could have had the EyeOne read a single color (like middle grey). But the
>
"Spot" function in Measure is reflective so that didn't work. I guess I
>
could try using Optical and it's advanced method whereby you call up a color
>
and measure. Would that be more useful???
>
Yes, OptiCAL's colorimeter window would do this for you, but only with
supported devices; though the supported Minolta meters would certainly qualify as
scientific standards devices. If you don't have a Minolta CA 100 sitting on
the shelf gathering dust, then you would need to use a Spyder or DTP92. But you
still need to compare multiple reading at one spot to multiple readings at
multiple spots to define anything resembling geometric screen variations.
C. David Tobie
Product Technology Manager
ColorVision Inc.
email@hidden
www.colorvision.com
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.