Re: BEST v5
Re: BEST v5
- Subject: Re: BEST v5
- From: bruce fraser <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 11:26:57 -0700
I'd go further.
For those many photographers for whom the loose image IS the page, a
PDF/Postscript workflow is very counterproductive. It's slower, more
complicated, and it introduces many uncertainties in the handling of
resolution, color and tone. If you need Postscript, you need
Postscript. If you simply want to render photographic imagery as well
as the device will permit, Postscript is a hindrance, not a help.
Bruce
At 2:13 PM -0400 10/12/03, email@hidden wrote:
Yup, thats the viewpoint that prepress oriented RIP people always express...
on the other hand fine art users are voting with their wallets for RIPs that
don't assume they are unfortunate folk not sophistocated in the virtues of a
good prepress RIP. I'm not saying that there can't be a bridge from one RIP to
the other; only that the fine art RIP's price, features, and especially ease
of
use need to be viewed specificly from the fine art angle, not as a poor
cousin approach from the prepress market.
C. David Tobie
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
--
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.