• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Monitor calibration & profiling in a multiuser OSX environment.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Monitor calibration & profiling in a multiuser OSX environment.


  • Subject: Re: Monitor calibration & profiling in a multiuser OSX environment.
  • From: kk_cs <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:37:59 +0200

In a message dated 9/1/03 1:37:27 AM, email@hidden writes:

If my understanding is correct, the process of recalibrating a monitor prior to
profiling it changes the behavior of the monitor (hopefully close to some
standard). Profiling then measures this new state.
I also thought that changing the behavior of the monitor, even a little, would
would render inaccurate all the previous profiles made for that monitor.

This is correct. You have to keep apart 2 different methods of calibrating a monitor.
- hardware calibration changes the behavior of the monitor through the monitor electronics (CRTs only). Some TFT manufacturers claim they hardware calibrate their displays, this is untrue. They have a 10bit LUT in the MONITOR instead on the graphics card, but it still is software calibration (or maybe you could call it firmware calibration).
- software calibration creates a video LUT and downloads it to the graphics card.

The first one is preferable, as far as quality goes.

QUESTION 1
If this is true can someone explain to me how having custom monitor profiles as
a personal user preference in a multiuser system (OSX) is meant to work?

Surely when any user recalibrates & profiles a monitor, the previously created
monitor profiles that are still in use by other people for that particular
monitor will then become inaccurate?

Maybe I have missed something obvious? The location of the monitor profile under
OS9 made more sense to me from a multiuser point of view.

For this environment, software calibration is the way to go. Quite some time ago (don4t ask how long, I don4t remember) Apple defined a "private" tag in the ICC monitor profiles and published it, so that everybody can create and use it. This tag, called vcgt holds the result of a software calibration - the video LUTs. ColorSync automatically detects and downloads these LUTs into the video card. Thus you change the calibration when selecting a new profile. Profile and calibration are inseparable and your monitor will always have the right calibration for the profile.
Windows doesn4t have that automatic mechanism and doesn4t know vcg tags. basICColor display writes them into the profiles anyway, but uses its own downloader to extract and download them.


QUESTION 2
Can EyeOne match's default monitor profile saving behavior be changed to save in
the 'Root(slash) / library / colorsync / profiles' rather than '~(home)/ library
/ colorsync / profiles' or is this a bad idea?

Doesn4t matter, where the profiles are. The only consequence would be, that every user can see and use all the profiles - even more confusion here.

Thanks for you help
Peter Miles


Regards,

Karl Koch


Color Solutions Consulting
Dipl.-Ing. Karl Koch
Falkenstra_e 13
D-82377 Penzberg
phone +49 (0)8856-932505
fax +49 (0)8856-932503
www.basICColor.de

basICColor. is a registered trademark of
Color Solutions Software, Germany

_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • calibration vs linearization explanation...
      • From: Chris Mahn <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: LCD bucks and bang
  • Next by Date: Re: LCD bucks and bang
  • Previous by thread: Re: Monitor calibration & profiling in a multiuser OSX environment.
  • Next by thread: calibration vs linearization explanation...
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread