Re: US Sheetfed Coated v2 TR001? / DTR004
Re: US Sheetfed Coated v2 TR001? / DTR004
- Subject: Re: US Sheetfed Coated v2 TR001? / DTR004
- From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 17:22:15 -0600
On Apr 6, 2004, at 10:21 AM, Henk Gianotten wrote:
On Monday Apr 5, 2004 David Harradine wrote:
I'm wondering why the "US Sheetfed Coated v2" profile in Photoshop
CS is not
SWOP certified when the web one is?
On Monday, April 5, 2004 Andrew Rodney wrote
It's based on TR001 (for my money, as close to SWOP as anything out
there).
and
On Monday April 5, 2004 Chris Murphy wrote:
Because it's not based on TR001, the expected colorimetric behavior
for SWOP.
O.K.! What is it?
I already posted what I know. I don't know any more than that. A while
back Adobe did a press run, and unfortunately there is no documentation
on the conditions as far as I know.
Probably a better solution in the interim is the draft TR004 data,
DTR004. It's less than ideal, but documented and more appropriate at
this point I think. Testing is the only way to find out.
http://www.npes.org/standards/toolsDTR004.html
I had the idea (reading both specs) that sheet fed and web on coated
stock class 1 were based on inks that would meet ISO 2846-1.
What differences in hue if the paper is identical?
The paper between U.S. Sheetfed Coated v2, and U.S. Web Coated (SWOP)
v2 are not identical. They're completely different. SWOP specifies #5.
The Adobe sheetfed profile used a #2 I think (might have been a #1).
Chris Murphy
Color Remedies (TM)
www.colorremedies.com/realworldcolor
---------------------------------------------------------
Co-author "Real World Color Management"
Published by PeachPit Press (ISBN 0-201-77340-6)
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.