Re: Conceptual Breakdown
Re: Conceptual Breakdown
- Subject: Re: Conceptual Breakdown
- From: Steve Upton <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:10:22 -0800
At 10:17 AM -0500 12/13/04, email@hidden wrote:
>
>Davis is correct. There is no original color space, as the data is synthetic. It was tagged with Adobe RGB (1998) before opening in ColorThink, so for all intents (no pun) and purposes, that's the original color space. What I don't understand is why, if I use CT to convert the image *to the same profile* I get a shift in color (i.e., big, long vectors at all image points). This does not occur when the original, untagged data is tagged with ProPhoto instead of Adobe, and the same exercise is carried out. The profiles behave very differently.
>
OK, I'll take a look at it and see what might be causing this.
This stuff can take a bit to "get one's head around" and then determine if ColorThink is doing it correctly or not.
Regards,
Steve
________________________________________________________________________
o Steve Upton CHROMiX www.chromix.com
o (hueman) 866.CHROMiX
o email@hidden 206.985.6837
o ColorGear ColorThink ColorValet ColorSmarts ProfileCentral
________________________________________________________________________
--
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden