RE: GMG Camflow cmyk seps
RE: GMG Camflow cmyk seps
- Subject: RE: GMG Camflow cmyk seps
- From: "Mike Eddington" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:19:16 -0500
- Importance: Normal
> we have starting using the
> Camflow cmyk seperation module more for our RGB - CMYK
> conversions. (primarily Adobe RGB - ISO (web or sheetfed).)
> We are finding the
> conversions very 'clean' and open, possibly TOO bright for
> our liking. What are other users experiences of this
> conversion process in GMG?
I've had the same experience with Camflow....separations had more shadow
detail, but seemed weak, too open and cool compared to an ICC
conversion, through Photoshop for example. I brought this to GMG's
attention and have been sent updated profiles for Iso, however, I'm
still seeing the same thing, though possibly to a lesser degree. I do
notice that equal RGB values separate more inline with a traditional
50,40,40 gray through Camflow than through an ICC conversion (Camflow
50, 40, 38; ICC 50, 43, 44), but I can't comment on whether that's a
good thing or not. My camflow testing has been kind of back-burnered
lately, but I'll see if I can find out anything additional through GMG.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden