Re: To iterate or not to iterate?
Re: To iterate or not to iterate?
- Subject: Re: To iterate or not to iterate?
- From: "Bob Frost" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:07:57 -0000
I suggested this on the Epson printers list about two years ago, and was
told by the experts there that it would not work/could not be done/would be
far too expensive/etc, etc. I could never see why it was not possible. Glad
to see that it might be possible.
Bob Frost.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry Wyse" <email@hidden>
* Set up profile editing "workflow" using a source (press?) and
destination (inkjet?) profile.
* Select the original measurement data used to build the source profile
or, in the case of a GMB profile, extract the measurement data from the
profile itself.
* Print a profiling target through this workflow on the inkjet device,
measure the result and import the measurement data into the profile
editor. Now you're using the ACTUAL measurement data resulting from the
profile conversion rather than the "measurement data" that is PREDICTED
by the conversion.
* Using the actual vs. predicted measurement data, perform the
necessary profile edits to the profile of your choice and create a new
optimized profile for that particular "workflow".
* The icing on the cake would the option to store these profile edits
so subsequent "iterations" could be further optimized.
Basically we're asking for "intelligent" profile editing based on the
actual results vs. the predicted results. I'd be the first person to
step up and buy such a product if it were available....at a reasonable
price. :-)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden