Re: 2nd try for ideas on RGB working space
Re: 2nd try for ideas on RGB working space
- Subject: Re: 2nd try for ideas on RGB working space
- From: "john c." <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:52:29 -0500
I can second that. We've been using DonRGB for years, which is very similar
to BestRGB, with no ill effects. We find it to be a well behaved, wide gamut
working space that allows conversions to the wide variety of output spaces
we have to employ, all without compromise. Why switch?
The only problem is that when we send files out, we frequently convert to a
smaller space, using this as insurance against some idiot ignoring our
embedded profile and thinking that we did a lousy job.
john c.
----- Original Message -----
From: <email@hidden>
To: <email@hidden>; <email@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 12:21 PM
Subject: 2nd try for ideas on RGB working space
>
<<I am a photographer that shoots transparency film, using a workflow that
is
>
mainly for inkjet output.... snip ... I am considering moving back to
>
Adobe98...any pros/cons?>>
>
>
Sure, a few cons. If you're printing to, say, Epson Luster, many of your
>
original yellows and greens may fall out of gamut, thus your prints won't
take
>
full advantage of the printer's gamut. Depends on your source images and
what
>
you shoot. Below is a link to a quickie comparison I did for someone
>
comparing the 3-D gamuts of AdobeRGB and ProPhotoRGB to Epson Premium
Luster. Your
>
milage may vary. ;-)
>
>
<< http://www.WildNaturePhotos.com/Public/Gamut.html >>
>
>
--Rich
>
_______________________________________________
>
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
>
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
>
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.