• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Photoshop Lab encoding (was: Scanner profile "too good"?)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Photoshop Lab encoding (was: Scanner profile "too good"?)


  • Subject: Re: Photoshop Lab encoding (was: Scanner profile "too good"?)
  • From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 11:46:33 -0700

ICC conversions in Photoshop have been through at least 20-bits/channel precision since Photoshop 5 if I recall correctly. Photoshop 7 and Photoshop CS both support 16-bits/channel LAB.


On Jan 3, 2004, at 1:42 PM, Roger Breton wrote:

I was reading up on Photoshop, TIFF and ICC Lab "Integer" encoding scheme on
Bruce Lindbloom excellent web site. And in the course of my reading, I was
wondering whether Photoshop CS still uses the same internal 8 bit integer
Lab encoding scheme used in previous versions?

It didn't occur to me that because CS now boats extended support for 16 bit
workflow because of 16 bit layers that the heart of Photoshop -- Lab --
still only 8 bit. Unless I am missing something.

Which means that, if I start with a fresh 16 bit RGB document that I later
to convert to Lab, for some reason, the particular Lab flavor that the
source color get converted into is still only 8 bit Lab?

I don't suppose that there are any signs of 16 bit Lab on the horizon?


Chris Murphy
Color Remedies (TM)
www.colorremedies.com/realworldcolor
---------------------------------------------------------
Co-author "Real World Color Management"
Published by PeachPit Press (ISBN 0-201-77340-6)
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Photoshop Lab encoding (was: Scanner profile "too good"?) (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: CMYKOG profiles in PosterPrint RIP?
  • Next by Date: RE: Artisan calibration/soft proof workflow
  • Previous by thread: Photoshop Lab encoding (was: Scanner profile "too good"?)
  • Next by thread: Epson 4000 & Custom Profiles
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread