• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Film vs. digicam gamma curve
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Film vs. digicam gamma curve


  • Subject: Re: Film vs. digicam gamma curve
  • From: "S. Jenkins" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:27:03 -0500

See these two threads...

http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=005Xce

http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=006Wy4

18 percent gray reflection is approximately 127, 127, 127
on a 0 to 255 scale.

HTH

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jarkko Viljanen" <email@hidden>
To: "Color List" <email@hidden>
Cc: "VVI OY" <email@hidden>; "Gunner Byskov" <email@hidden>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 06:57 AM
Subject: Film vs. digicam gamma curve


> Hello!
> A colleague of mine is teaching professional photographers and is
> confused with how digital cameras treat image data. The issue rises when
> trying to compare the gamma curves of film material with digital camera
> performance.
>
> Here is an example: Lets take a photograph of a target, in which there
> is full black (D2,1), 18% gray (D0,7) and white (D0,0), using a
> professional digicam. When the image is opened in Photoshop, the
> RGB-values in info for black is about 30, gray 127 and white about 240.
> What we would expect for the values would be black 2-4, white about 250
> and gray 46-47 (to represent the photographers gray card, which the
> target is). However the gray looks right on the monitor and further,
> also when printed: it is the gray we started with (D0,7).
>
> Did anyone get a clue what we are talking about or what is happening
there?
>
> Jarkko
> --
>
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
> PixelCom
> Jarkko Viljanen
> Kuuliantie 5
> 37470 Vesilahti
> Finland
>
> http://www.pixelcom.fi
>
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
> _______________________________________________
> colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Film vs. digicam gamma curve (From: Jarkko Viljanen <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: RE: Film vs. digicam gamma curve
  • Next by Date: Re: Film vs. digicam gamma curve
  • Previous by thread: RE: Film vs. digicam gamma curve
  • Next by thread: Re: Film vs. digicam gamma curve
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread