• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Barco v. Artisans
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Barco v. Artisans


  • Subject: Barco v. Artisans
  • From: Roger Howard <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:02:50 -0800

I'm looking for feedback on the relative merits and experiences with these two monitor lines, for use in a critical color environment. We've got several digital imaging labs here working on a range of projects, but each with a dedicated focus on digitization of portions of our collections - ranging from antiquities (ancient statues, relics, jewelry), to decorative arts (think Louis XIV chairs), to drawings, pastels, and oil paintings.

For some years now we have depended on Barco monitors - several models - for our color stations, primarily used for editing and color correction of scans against matched light boxes. We profile our scanning devices (drums and flatbeds) and have pretty solid LUTs and profiles to handle incoming color, but there is often some correction still needed. Increasingly, we are moving to direct digital capture (mix of scanning backs and one-shot backs mostly, depending on the subject), which of course removes the light boxes from the equation, but otherwise the workflow is fairly similar (though rather than correcting against a 4x5 in a viewing station we have to do two passes for color - one at capture time, and one in editing in the labs).

Barco's have been a consistent, known quantity for us, but not without their troubles, though generally they performed as well and easily as anything we could find. Now it's time to reconsider hardware for the next several years, especially as our migration to OSX accelerates and we've got a number of older Barco displays that won't make the cut (no drivers). We'd like to keep as homogenous an environment as possible, of course.

There seems to be a growing attraction to the Artisan line, which we have investigated and demoed, but are looking for real-world comparisons from people used to dealing with critical color. Beyond quality control, the more efficiently (ease vs results) we can keep the displays in tune with accurate calibration and profiling the better for our technical support and for our operators.

Aside from cost issues, can you provide any experienced remarks regarding the merits of Artisans, especially in contrast with the Barcos we've depended on for so long. Are the calibration and profiling processes as tight as with the Barco? What are your experiences with Sony's support - does this feel like a product line prone to possible abandonment, or is Sony as committed as (obviously) Barco is to their pro displays? What about bugs and anomalies? I've heard the Artisans are not particularly friendly to multiple-display setups, for instance.

Any feedback or comments you can provide would be very appreciated. Demos and testing are part of the plan as well, but that can't necessarily shake out any gotchas we might face in production. If I'm missing anything here - other options - any pointers would be great, too.

Best regards,

Roger Howard
The J. Paul Getty Trust
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Barco v. Artisans
      • From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: esRGB?
  • Next by Date: Re: Barco v. Artisans
  • Previous by thread: Re: esRGB?
  • Next by thread: Re: Barco v. Artisans
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread