Re: colorsync-users digest, Vol 3 #1384 - 12 msgs
Re: colorsync-users digest, Vol 3 #1384 - 12 msgs
- Subject: Re: colorsync-users digest, Vol 3 #1384 - 12 msgs
- From: mo <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 19:54:43 -0400
- Organization: moing
>
One could even argue what really constitutes "printing what you gave
>
me" or "printing the numbers in the file". If a printer doesn't perform
>
a profile conversion but if they're using plate curves before it gets
>
to press, are they technically still printing to the numbers in the
>
file? IOW, if my image asks for 50% but the plate curve has bumped the
>
50% dot to 54% to compensate for dot gain/loss, then have they printed
>
my image "untouched"?
>
>
Discuss. :-)
Discuss?
Sure!
If your files are separated with a SWOP standard and your way the F*&k out in left field as
far as plate calibration and you can't hit a SWOP proof, your pretty much acured that the
pinter ain't even near some kind of reality.
>
>
>
>
>
2G of embedded profiles is a big deal even if you're using DVD. How
>
much longer does it take for InDesign or QuarkXPress to parse through a
>
document linking images with 2G worth of embedded profiles? The data is
>
not ignored, it actually gets read each time.
In Quark, it not big deal. In In Design, it depends upon the flattening situation.
So what!
It's not that big of a deal guys!
It may seem as a huge amount of data, and it is, but the point that I'm trying to make is
that, no own is watching the meter and who gives a shit if you check clears.
Stop thinking macro.
>
>
Yet you don't answer the question.
Which question that you have would you like answered?
There are many within whatever context you read into
mo
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.