• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Who"s right?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Who"s right?


  • Subject: Re: Who"s right?
  • From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 20:59:20 -0600

On Jun 10, 2004, at 8:36 PM, Roger Breton wrote:

Personally, my testing shows BPC to be redundant when used with perceptual
rendering.

Better: it does not do anything. And it should not.

Actually it can, and with some profiles it does, Monaco profiles come to mind. That's why Black Point Compensation is a checkbox, not a fifth rendering intent limited to just Relative Colorimetric + Black Point Compensation.

That we effectively get a Black Point Compensation type of result with perceptual doesn't imply that we are getting a dynamic tone compression using perceptual. With Black Point Compensation we do.


Chris Murphy
Color Remedies (TM)
www.colorremedies.com/realworldcolor
---------------------------------------------------------
Co-author "Real World Color Management"
Published by PeachPit Press (ISBN 0-201-77340-6)
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


References: 
 >Re: Who"s right? (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Who's right?
  • Next by Date: Re: colorsync-users digest, Vol 3 #1391 - 16 msgs
  • Previous by thread: Re: Who"s right?
  • Next by thread: Re: colorsync-users digest, Vol 3 #1386 - 14 msgs
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread