• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Remote proofing
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Remote proofing


  • Subject: Re: Remote proofing
  • From: Henrik Holmegaard <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:46:29 +0100

On tirsdag, mar 9, 2004, at 19:24 Europe/Copenhagen, Rich Apollo wrote:

The point that I was trying to make is that the PDF/X construct doesn't solve any color issues (other than PDF/X-1 dictating that everything be in CMYK). The fact that 88% of interviewees reported that the PDF's they're receiving are built incorrectly means that the odds are against you constructing an adequate PDF file and against your receiving correctly built PDF files.

The output intent is one more variable that will most likely be innappropriately used.

In my experience one can talk a pessimistic view, in which case one does not make the attempt to begin with, or one can take an optimistic view in which case one has the difficulty that everyone else is pessimistic -:).

In the 1998 - 2001 timeframe the pessimist position was that image design studios would never be able to set rendering intents manually for single object / single space workflows, let alone for multiple object / multiple space workflows.

The premier image capture platform, LinoColor and ColorOpen, remained with automatic settings and the premier image editing platform, Photoshop, moved from automatic settings to manual settings.

The current pessimist position might want to consider that application software implemented according to the previous pessimist position is no longer part of the market, so maybe the pessimists have got something wrong -:).

Thanks for the historical information. Very cool.

IMHO the color people have learned to haggle for a higher price by claiming they can open the doors of perception, while the type people have learned to haggle for a higher price by claiming they can open the annals of history.

The page designer is caught between these extremes, the Historicist and the Perceptualist, and is also saddled with understanding the mechanics of separation planes and screenings in the Adobe Imaging Model.

If these poor people are not to be driven nuts, we had better come up with some simple conceptual synergies that can get them on board -:).

Thanks,
Henrik
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


References: 
 >(no subject) (From: Rich Apollo <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: RE: colorsync-users digest, Vol 3 #1253 - 8 msgs
  • Next by Date: Re: Remote proofing
  • Previous by thread: (no subject)
  • Next by thread: Re: Remote proofing
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread