Re: Remote proofing
Re: Remote proofing
- Subject: Re: Remote proofing
- From: Henrik Holmegaard <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:43:48 +0100
I wrote:
>When the second Mac-based project rolled out in 2000 there were
lithographers
>who swore that ICC-based gamut mapping could not deliver the same
quality
>as eye-balled scanner curves and manual desaturations.
From my point of view the purpose of the Eye-One Color Cookbooks, which
Apple hosted until a few months ago, was to apply a simple and
effective infographics system to help image designers and page
designers set rendering intents correctly when balancing between
Adobe-only RCBP and open Perceptual workflows.
It may be that one Perceptual approach does not please, but that is no
good reason to reject all Perceptual approaches. There are dumb and
there are smart line layout tables and there are dumb and there are
smart gamut mapping tables. There is a distinction between the baby and
the bathwater in a sane world.
(I know the marketing purpose for the title may have been different,
but I would say that the title in its two release lifetime served its
purpose for many, many people in a toned-down and structured approach
(as opposed to the Bagdad bazaar approach which at least here in
Scandinavia is unprofessional).)
Thanks,
Henrik
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.