Re: Remote proofing
Re: Remote proofing
- Subject: Re: Remote proofing
- From: bruce fraser <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:57:10 -0800
At 4:10 PM -0500 3/14/04, Roger Breton wrote:
> I don't know anyone who holds this as an expectation-we've all been
bitten too many times. It is, however, a need-9-point type in rich
black tends to get ugly-and a goal for the future.
9 point type? Who uses 9-point type in a placed Photoshop RGB document? Give
me a break.
You'd be surprised, but it could just as easily be in a placed
FreeHand, Illustrator, PDF, or nested combination from hell of all
three. The really special cases involve Freehand EPS placed in an
Illustrator doc, then the composite placed in QXP3.3.2r5, printed to
disk, and Distilled...
> It's worth bearing in mind that the original vision for PDF was that
it would be a delivery system to personal printers-lasers and
inkjets-rather than as a tool for print manufacturing. For desktop
printers, the issues I've raised aren't terribly important. Presses
are another story.
It's worth bearing in mind that the current vision for Adobe PDF is to serve
as a print manufacturing tool rather than a delivery system to personal
printers-lasers and inkjets.
Hence my awkward insistence that it actually be made to work.
--
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.