• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Epson 2200 and Ultrachrome
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Epson 2200 and Ultrachrome


  • Subject: Epson 2200 and Ultrachrome
  • From: Bob Rushing <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:29:06 -0500

This is my experience with the epson 2200.

My images are from a Kodak 14n. My working space in PS is set to ProPhoto RGB. I capture images in 16 bit color and strictly use TIFF files. No JPG. and no compression.

When I first purchased the 2200 I was using it on the Windows platform. W2K Prof., PS7 on a dual cpu box. Although PS was quite fast running on dual processors, I just couldn't get the colors right on Windows, no matter what I tried. I was using the Epson driver with the canned profiles and my prints were just blaaa.

Next, I switched over to my G4 running OSX. At first this was a nightmare. I had to do quite a bit of research in order to get ColorSync to work correctly with the Epson driver. Quite honestly, I was at the point of eBaying the Epson. What helped me enormously was purchasing the book "Real World Color Management". Probably my most wisely spent fifty dollars. Now, all my printing that is important gets printed using the G4 and the 2200.

These are my observations regarding profiling the Epson. My first attempt, I tried a friends Monaco profiling software and got absolutely nowhere with it. And it isn't likeI didn't try. I just couldn't get it to work on my 2200 either on the G4 or the Windows box. The next product I tried was Pantone ColorVision Pro that comes with the Spider and PrintFix. I purchased this product because it had a thirty day money back guarantee. This product worked. I profiled my 2200 and to my amazement, the prints were quite close to what was on my aging monitor. My test prints gave me the most accurate color reproduction I have achieved thus far. And I did this using the profile that was made using PrintFix.

Now here's the catch. I print the same image using the PrintFix profile and the Epson profile then hold the prints side by side. What I observe is the profile created using PrintFix is accurate, the Epson profile produces more saturated colors. Next I compare the prints to the actual subject. I don't have a viewing booth or 5500K lighting but the PrintFix print is almost dead-nuts-on as far as color of the actual physical subject and color on the print. So I'm thinking - wow, I'm impressed. So I take the two prints and show them to a client, prints side by side and ask her "what do you think and which one do you like best?" She picked the print made using the Epson driver as the one she likes! At first this threw me. So the lesson that I eventually learned after repeating this side by side comparison using non color savvy subjects is - what sells. It appears to me people will pick what they feel is pleasing to their visual senses and not what is necessarily accurate color reproduction. So here I was beating my head against a hard subject trying to find this magical solution when it is now obvious to me it's what the client wants. I would go crazy trying to get the the color "just right" and all along, the client liked the print that they thought was most pleasing - not most accurate. When asked why, they responded "I like the color on this one" or "this one has nicer color" (pointing to the print made with the Epson driver). Than again, this is explained in "Real World Color Management" because after reading the book, it now makes sense to me. My own artwork however, is another story. But artistic expression is an different animal than photographing people and events for hire.

I checked into some of the RIP drivers and they are too expensive for me right now. And I too don't like or use the Epson Vivid color option. I think it's horrible but, to each his own. Plus, what this forum has shown me is that first you have to start with a calibrated monotor. No ifs, ands or buts. Calibrate that monitor. And if you can't, go buy one you can calibrate.


regards
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Prev by Date: Re: Photoshop 7/Quark 5 Workflow
  • Next by Date: Re: Epson 2200 and Ultrachrome
  • Previous by thread: Re: Epson Ultrachrome profiles
  • Next by thread: Re: Epson 2200 and Ultrachrome
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread