• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: A new RIP?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A new RIP?


  • Subject: Re: A new RIP?
  • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:44:55 +1000
  • Organization: Color Technology Solutions

email@hidden wrote:
I mentioned this RIP on the list some time ago. Its the first instance I have seen of keyed media... that is to say you need to use a special key for every sheet of media printed on with this RIP. The spectral (though canned) fingerprint process sounds decidedly familiar from another RIP that resurfaces repackaged in one manner or another every so often, but as a single purpose proofing RIP, using canned printer definitions (no matter how "spectral"), and keying every sheet of media that runs through the printer, I was sufficiently uninterested to not pursuing determining the actual core involved.

Sounds mostly like Hype. Spectral characterization can be useful, but current
inkjet printers don't appear to be intended for spectral reproduction, even
if spectral profiling software is available. Most articles I've come across
regarding spectral reproduction talk about carefully choosing inks so was to
act as a good set of spectral basis functions for reproducing the expected
input spectra targets. Most inkjet inksets seem to be chosen on the basis
of matching industry expectations (ie. CMYK is expected), as well as
compensating for device limitations (ie. light C, M & K to compensate for
visible dots etc.)

Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


References: 
 >Re: A new RIP? (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Multiple devices calibration
  • Next by Date: Re: A new RIP?/Aurelon Info
  • Previous by thread: Re: A new RIP?
  • Next by thread: 2200
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread