• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Profile Editing/ Potential Disaster?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Profile Editing/ Potential Disaster?


  • Subject: Re: Profile Editing/ Potential Disaster?
  • From: "vanita" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:13:30 -0500

Roger,
I did see the post, however I'm not familiar with Gracol TR-004. Isn't it a printing standard? If so, are your suggesting we print to Gracol standards and use a general profile such as Web Coated Swop V2 (or whatever profile is used for Gracol). I'm not sure if the Approval is Gracol Certified, but i know it is SWOP certified and we do keep our densities and dot gain numbers within SWOP standards. But we do not use the Web Coated Swop V2 profile. Is there really something wrong with us using custom profiles for our proofer? we haven't had any negative feedback since we implemented this workflow, i'm just worried about how the profile i'm using now will later effect the press considering the issues i described in my first email.
Thank you,
Vanita

On Mar 31, 2004, at 12:25 PM, Roger Breton wrote:

Richard,

We don't have a press. I guess you could say we're the "middle man". We
can handle everything from input to proof, but after that the client
takes it wherever they please. What we supply the client is an Approval
proof and a cd containing the 2 versions of the file; one tagged as a
ColorMatch RGB and one a untagged CMYK file. We also include our
Approval's profile on the cd. It would probably be easier if we had the
press's profile, but that can be any number of vendors and some of our
clients aren't always sure what the file's resolution should be much
less who the file will go to.

Vanita

So there couldn't be no harm tagging your CMYK files with a Gracol TR-004
profile? That would set some kind of working ground level, at least. And
your proofing could target that as well, just like the gentleman who posted
last week who said he was trying to proof Gracol TR-004 on his Approval.

Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Profile Editing/ Potential Disaster?
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Profile Editing/ Potential Disaster? (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: RE: Gracol TR004 specs
  • Next by Date: Re: Profile Editing/ Potential Disaster?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Profile Editing/ Potential Disaster?
  • Next by thread: Re: Profile Editing/ Potential Disaster?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread