• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: ICColor vs. DTP41
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ICColor vs. DTP41


  • Subject: Re: ICColor vs. DTP41
  • From: Dan Reid <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 12:32:16 -0700

on 5/17/04 8:20 PM, Roger Breton at email@hidden wrote:

> I9ve read somewhere (Greg Barnett) that the ICColor, apparently, has some
> inherent bias in reading colors? In trying to substantiate that basis, I9ve
> been reading on the ICColor and the Spectrolino specs. For one thing, I
> found it odd that the ICColor accuracy is expressed in terms of dE*94, which
> is a weighted color difference metric, whereas the Spectrolino accuracy is
> expressed in terms of dE*ab, making it impossible (to my knowledge) to
> directly compare the two units: can 0.3 dE*94 (ICColor) be likened to 0.3
> dE*ab (Lino)? From my limited color knowledge, this suggests that the Lino
> is more 'accurate' than the ICColor.
>
> At any rate, I find the repeatability of the ICColor pretty low in
> comparison to the Spectrolino less than 0.2 dE*94 vs. 0.03 eE*ab for the
> Spectrolino? FWIW, the i1 has a better repeatability than the ICColor :
> 0.1E* 94 vs. 0.2 dE*94. I know these differences are tiny but for the amount
> of money we have to pay for these instruments, I wonder if the ICColor is
> all that worthed?
>
> Inter-instrument agreements
>
> Average 0.3 E* 94 (ICColor) vs 0.4 E* 94 (EyeOne) vs 0.3 dE*ab (Lino). The
> ICColor seems to be 'better' than the EyeOone but it's not possible to
> compare it with the Lino.
>
> DTP41 specs are quoted in terms of dEcmc with a value 0.3. Inter-instrument
> agreement is quoted at 0.2 dE (does not say dE*ab or dEcmc or what, just
> dE?). So there we have it, no standard of comparison across manufacturers or
> even within the same manufacturer.
>
> Bottom line, is the ICColor any good?
>
> Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
> http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
>
>
>
To make maters more interesting the preliminary brochures released at Drupa
for X-rite indicated 0.3 CMC inter-instrument agreement and 0.2 delta E (I
assume a*b*) repeatability on white for the new Slingshot (DTP70). No stats
available for the Xrite Pulse (EyeOne competitor)

All being said the ICColor does an impressive job with the limited jobs I
have done with it and see it as a good alternative to the 'lino.
--
Dan B. Reid
RENAISSANCE PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGING
Color Management Products & Training for Print, Internet, & Motion Graphics
http://www.rpimaging.com | Toll Free: (866) RGB-CMYK
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


References: 
 >ICColor vs DTP41 (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Flexo, ICC and Dot Gain
  • Next by Date: Re: ICColor vs DTP41
  • Previous by thread: ICColor vs DTP41
  • Next by thread: Re: ICColor vs DTP41
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread