Re: Speaking of RIPs...
Re: Speaking of RIPs...
- Subject: Re: Speaking of RIPs...
- From: gariba <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:22:29 -0200
I would like to know from anyone about ScanVec's PhotoPrint, color
management, and the render of photographic images. Is it good?
On Nov 19, 2004, at 11:39 AM, Roger Breton wrote:
StudioPrint
Pros: enduser can generate first-rate custom profiles; linearize the
printer; drive Epsons in native CMYK; latest version has complete
profiling
solution built-in (minus a spectrphotometer); stellar tech support;
very
responsive to their customer feedback in adding requested features
Cons: missing some minor production-oriented layout features that IP
has
(some of these have been addressed in v11 I understand)
Have you ever compared color conversions made in StudioPrint through
designated Input and Output profiles to those you could make in
Photoshop?
Except for the fact that you don't have access to Black Point
Compensation
(I don't think that feature exist, yet, in StudioPrint), can you say
that
both engines convert colors the same?
Regards,
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
Clinica Tratamento de Imagem,
Érico Veríssimo, 614, 301,
Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
90.180-160.
Fone: 3231 0216
Fax: 3219 7723
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden