• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Adobe Acrobat versions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Adobe Acrobat versions


  • Subject: Re: Adobe Acrobat versions
  • From: <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:34:50 -0500

Roger,

Following your response,

Like I said, I gather that Word treats all color as sRGB but doesn't pass
this information on to the print driver at the time of generating the
PostScript on the way to Distiller, if Distiller can be found on the host.
PDF Writer is even more simplistic. In the end, I believe everything ends up
in CalRGB which is close to ColorMatch RGB in terms of specs, last time I looked at it.

I made a small test placing identical TIF images, one with an embedded Adobe (1998) profile, and the second one without a profile, in a Word doc. The two images were encoded in Adobe (1998) RGB.(test done in Windows)


The image with the profile got converted to sRGB once placed in Word, the other obviously stayed the same. When transformed in a pdf with Color Mgmt options "ON", the attached profile for both images is sRGB.(this was the defaut working space defined in Distiller).

With the same file, I then assigned Adobe (1998) as the working space and now everything is managed as being Adobe (1998). The first image, the one which has an Adobe profile, is now too saturated (not surprising since it was twice converted), and the second one, which had no profile but which was also based on Adobe (1998) RGB data, is now properly shown (which proves that Word can output pdf in another space, with help from Distiller).

My partial conclusion (Note: I may have used different version than the ones you had when you made your tests): Word + Distiller support other color spaces as long as you do not mix spaces and you do not mix tagged and untagged images. As you said, Word treats everything as sRGB (even transforming files when they have a profile). It is up to Distiller to place things in the right perspective. (more analysis required here as there are many options to get to the same results)

As for CMYK separation, you mentioned PitStop could do it. Are there other ways to do that (Acrobat 7 ?) ?
Is it required to go CMYK if you go from PDF to DocuColor?


Danny

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:00:49 -0500
 Roger Breton <email@hidden> wrote:
I suspect the "trouble" you are referring to relates to
obtaining accurate color control. If this is the case,
could you elaborate on the typical problems I could face
using Word documents as the source. I am familiar with the
B&W-MS_Word-pdf workflow, having gone through the process
of publishing books with hundreds of B&W illustrations
done on a DocuTech, but I am less familiar with the
Color-MS_Word-pdf type of results.


Danny
www.BabelColor.com

The biggest trouble I'm aware of, I could be wrong, is the fact that all
objects are considered as RGB color, even black text. So that's a problem
for folks who don't have a PitStop type of PDF Plug-in to accurately convert
the RGB objects to CMYK. And there's also the problem of placed images in
Word. How can those ever be color-managed? I believe if one makes the
assumption that all colors in Word and indeed Office is sRGB then it should
all make sense. But I have not gone further than that, myslef, because I
don't have a requirement to use Word in my work.


Like I said, I gather that Word treats all color as sRGB but doesn't pass
this information on to the print driver at the time of generating the
PostScript on the way to Distiller, if Distiller can be found on the host.
PDF Writer is even more simplistic. In the end, I believe everything ends up
in CalRGB which is close to ColorMatch RGB in terms of specs, last time I
looked at it.


Regards,

Roger Breton  |  Laval, Canada  |  email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

Thank-you for your interest in BabelColor.

Web site: www.BabelColor.com
BabelColor, an innovative tool to compare and translate
data between RGB spaces.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Adobe Acrobat versions
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Adobe Acrobat versions (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Epson 9600 Production time
  • Next by Date: Re: Epson 9600 Production time
  • Previous by thread: Re: Adobe Acrobat versions
  • Next by thread: Re: Adobe Acrobat versions
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread