• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Workflow implications on profiling
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Workflow implications on profiling


  • Subject: Workflow implications on profiling
  • From: Matt Nelson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:01:51 -0600

Alright, here I go again. If these questions suit another list better, let me know, as I didn't want to cross post.

I'm nearly through RWCM 2nd Ed. and understand far more now that I have in the past. Here is my setup:
Workstations to AWS Nexus with an option to drive my BestScreen Proof to Epson 7600, or to send one bit tiffs to our new Latran Prediction 1420 dot proofer for proofs for customer who just plain won't take a inkjet proof (plus I can laminate to press substrates.) Our presses (ast least what I'm focused on right now are MarkAndy 2200's 10" and 7"., we are mainly flexo).


I understand the principles of getting the press and Epson profiled so that I can use them as output profiles. However, I'm a bit stumped on how to place the dot proofer into the setup. With a ROOM workflow, I'm setup to drive the dot proofer as with the Best-Epson, as in using the same rip data. However, it seems to me that although I can generate a profile for my press, (which right now, does not have gray balanced as I would like), there is no way to generate a profile for the dot proofer, or rather there is, but there is no way to apply it. Or is there? Would it not seem to be correct to get the dp to be as "off" as the press sheet, then would an output profile assigned to the job which is run through the RIP and which then drives the imagesetter and the proofer make them match? I assume this is somewhat reasonable, since the press and the dot proofer are both using actual dots, with CMYK ink sheets would closely match the densities of the press ink (however, not perfectly, which is part of what makes me unsure of this workflow design.)

And of course, both presses have different gain as well. ( I use flexocal for this, and am now using hybrid screening for quite good highlight results on press.) Side note, i have GM's eyeOne, and Profilemaker 4.1, waiting on the upgrade to 5 to come in.

Okay, thats all my brain can hold right now.

Thanks guys.




-- Matt Nelson, A+, Network +, MCP Chief Prepress Specialist Director of Technology Resources Nelson Printing Company Nelson Label Company Jonesboro, Arkansas email@hidden http://www.nelsonprinting.com

---

Idiot Box, n.:
The part of the envelope that tells a person where to place the
stamp when they can't quite figure it out for themselves.
-- Rich Hall, "Sniglets"



_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Prev by Date: Canon i9950
  • Next by Date: Re: Real world experience w/ GMG and Oris RIPs
  • Previous by thread: Re: Canon i9950
  • Next by thread: FW: Custom profiling the epson printers
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread