• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
RE: Any use for the D65 filter on the Spectrolino?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Any use for the D65 filter on the Spectrolino?


  • Subject: RE: Any use for the D65 filter on the Spectrolino?
  • From: "Hirsch, Steve" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:51:27 -0400
  • Thread-topic: Any use for the D65 filter on the Spectrolino?

Title: RE: Any use for the D65 filter on the Spectrolino?

Hi Marco,

I haven't done a test yet with the D65 Viewing Light Source option checked but I will plan to do so since you've got me curious. I'll let you know what I find.

Steve

Steven Hirsch, Systems Manager
Hachette Filipacchi Media, U. S.
212-767-6536

    ----------
    From:   Marco Ugolini
    Sent:   Tuesday, April 12, 2005 6:03 PM
    To:     Hirsch, Steve
    Cc:     ColorSync Users Mailing List
    Subject:        RE: Any use for the D65 filter on the Spectrolino?

    In a message dated Mon, 11 Apr 2005 14:11:27, Steve Hirsch wrote:

    > I compared the two profiles (D65 and Unfiltered) via my test images and also
    > compared white point adjusted versions. Both myself and my top color gal,
    > reviewed the results and we found that the D65 filtered profile did indeed
    > give us better results than the non-filtered version, i.e., there was a
    > significant amount of shape and contrast improvement overall as well as
    > gradient transition improvement in both the Cyan and Magenta channels
    > especially. The D65 filtered results appeared to "eat up" a great deal of the
    > Yellow cast throughout the range which usually required a yellow curve tweak
    > in the forward tag to reduce cast contamination in my softproofing profile. We
    > had far less of a distance to travel when tweaking the softproofing profile
    > when starting with the D65 filtered profile.

    Steve,

    In the message appended to your post, Brian Ashe (of Gretag Macbeth) points
    out that one can select D65 from the "Viewing Light Source" pull-down menu
    in ProfileMaker. I myself have not yet thought of making profiles using the
    D65 menu choice in ProfileMaker, but I will start to explore that option
    now, and to compare the results to those obtained using D50.

    Just out of curiosity, and for the sake of your test's completeness for
    Popular Photography, are you going to create a profile using the D65 light
    source menu choice in ProfileMaker with an unfiltered Spectroscan? Please
    let me know if you do. If the results were to come out very close to those
    you obtained using the physical D65 filter, that would be very interesting.

    Thank you.

    Marco Ugolini
    Mill Valley, CA

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Prev by Date: re: 16 bits = 15 bits in Photoshop?
  • Next by Date: RE: Epson 10600 and 9600 Printers
  • Previous by thread: RE: Any use for the D65 filter on the Spectrolino?
  • Next by thread: Editing a profile's Device Attributes
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread