• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 507 -Filtering
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 507 -Filtering


  • Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 507 -Filtering
  • From: Robin Myers <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:52:43 -0800

Herr Steib,

On Dec 22, 2005, at 14:09, Stefan Steib wrote:

Nathan and Robin

I´m talking of Photography and not snapshot taking.

So am I.

If you want to do sports or people go without filter and do not care about the noise.

Any time you put a filter into the optical path the signal is decreased by the spectral transmittance of the filter. Thus, the digital sensor must increase the exposure, either by increasing the analog gain, the digital gain, changing the shutter speed, or increasing the aperture opening. All of these changes degrade the image by some amount. Whether the degradation is acceptable to the photographer depends on the desired result. Noise will be increased by changing the analog or digital gain, quantization may also occur with increasing the digital gain, increasing the exposure time (shutter speed) may produce more blurring in moving objects and produce more dark current noise, opening the aperture will reduce depth of field.


If you have to fullfill quality photography (and this was the original Question because using a Leaf Aptus or a Phase One 25 meg chip freehand for reportages
seems a bit "exotic" to me, but what do I know.....) and you need to catch any bit of information and color which is there,
I would propose you remember another glorious invention of our forefathers - a tripod.
Although I have seen some interieur Photographers or industry guys go berzerk during their work on location, I have never seen anyone of those
using Automatic exposure shooting their 20+ Mpixel backs.............
I don´t know how guys do this over there in the US, well..... I wouldn´t do it...................<G>
I know these wratten filters are so heavy and bulky, it´s a real nuisance to carry another 10 gramms with my 150 kilos of highend Camera stuff.
I understand that fullheartedly........<G>. (BTW - do you remember that putting a wratten on the back of a lens is nearly like a free lunch...???)

The laws of physics did not change with the advent of digital photography. When shooting film with filters there were tables of filter factors that were applied to the exposure to compensate for the reduction in light.


<snip>

Robin Myers
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 507 -Filtering (From: "Stefan Steib" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 507 -Filtering
  • Next by Date: Re: Christmas present from GretagMacbeth
  • Previous by thread: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 507 -Filtering
  • Next by thread: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 507 -Filtering
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread