Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 507 -Filtering
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 507 -Filtering
- Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 507 -Filtering
- From: Nathan Duran <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:16:41 -0800
On Dec 22, 2005, at 2:09 PM, Stefan Steib wrote:
Nathan and Robin
I´m talking of Photography
Oh, OK. Are all those bizarre ellipsis trails and bracketed Gs some
kind of super advanced photography jargon my pitiful US-born mind can
never hope to understand then? Here I thought your cat just fell asleep
on the keyboard or something.
If you don't have so much as a single shot demonstrating the magical
noise eliminating capabilities of your trusty old tungsten filter to
show off, then what exactly are you basing this assertion on in the
first place? I can certainly swallow the fact that the inflated red
content of tungsten light would lead to a minor noise flare up in a
typical mosaic-ed sensor design where red pixels are in the
interpolated minority, but I have my doubts that it's anything
NoiseNinja couldn't tame out of a print (if it were even noticeable at
all in the first place), and I have even further doubts that a blue
filter is going to accomplish much in the way of eliminating it. I'd be
more than happy to be proven wrong, but smarmy, patronizing hubris and
an irrational disdain for event photographers alone are not going to do
it.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden