• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: ICC Profiling Software Review
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ICC Profiling Software Review


  • Subject: Re: ICC Profiling Software Review
  • From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 08:36:18 -0700

Title: Re: ICC Profiling Software Review
On 2/2/05 8:22 AM, "Abhay Sharma"  wrote:

Yes we evaluated this product as part of the WMU Profiling Review document. In the scanner section this product had very accurate DE numbers and when we viewed the gamut it was very smooth. In the printer profile section this product was ranked above MonacoProfiler 4.7.

I got a copy to test about 6-8 months ago and the RGB profiles I produced were truly awful so I’m not sure what’s up with the disconnect between the two “findings”. I didn’t do any fancy detalE analysis, the print on the light box was enough. I gladly returned the product that was provided for review...

Andrew Rodney
http://digitaldog.net/
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: ICC Profiling Software Review
      • From: Stéphane Beaudry <email@hidden>
References: 
 >ICC Profiling Software Review (From: Abhay Sharma <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: ICC Profiling Software Review
  • Next by Date: Re: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
  • Previous by thread: ICC Profiling Software Review
  • Next by thread: Re: ICC Profiling Software Review
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread