• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
RE: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?


  • Subject: RE: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
  • From: "michael shaffer" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 07:08:30 -0330
  • Importance: Normal

 Tom Lianza write ...
> ..., I was in college and I wrote the organization a letter
>  expressingmy opinion, that D50 was representative of
> NOTHING and a really  poor choice.
> ...   From the standpoint of  illuminating fine art
> masters, tungsten is probably far more representative of the lighting
> that the artist used when painting (torch or candle).  It's not a bad
> choice.

  I thought most artists preferred "northern exposure" ... i,e,. 5000K(?)

cheerios ... shAf  :o)
Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland
www.micro-investigations.com (in progress)
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art? (From: "tlianza" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
  • Next by Date: Re: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
  • Next by thread: Re: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread