• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?


  • Subject: Re: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
  • From: "tlianza" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:14:42 -0500

Hi to all,

I thought I would chime in on this discussion. It's important for everyone to understand that the selection of D50 was not aimed at making images look good, it was aimed at being able to EASE THE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENCES between images. That was one of the compromises in it's choice. For critical difference measurements, many researches argued for a HIGHER COLOR TEMPERATURE. As I remember, there were many recommendations to use D75 for critical press-proof comparisons. The problem was at these higher CT's the images didn't look good and the fact that there was detectable difference between the print and proof didn't mean that much if neither image looked acceptable. There was also a need for evaluation at relatively high illuminances (500 to 2000 lux) to maintain median state of adaptation. When this standard was first proposed as an Ansi Photographic Standard, I was in college and I wrote the organization a letter expressing my opinion, that D50 was representative of NOTHING and a really poor choice. First, it was physically unrealizable, so it would have a huge impact on the interpretation of measured objects with respect to reproduced scenes. Second, it was too high in CT to represent any real life presentation mechanism. Nearly all home lighting of the time (late 60s early '70s) was well below that (including fluorescents) . The reason that tungsten is popular is because it is cheap and the images look good (with the exception of images from the Epson 2200) . From the standpoint of illuminating fine art masters, tungsten is probably far more representative of the lighting that the artist used when painting (torch or candle). It's not a bad choice.

Take care
TL


Tom Lianza Director of Display and Capture Technologies GretagMacbeth LLC 3 Industrial Drive Unit 7&8 Windham, NH 03087 603.681.0315 x232 Tel 603.681.0316 Fax


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • RE: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
      • From: "michael shaffer" <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Nonlinear camera sensors
  • Next by Date: Artisan Calibration Problems
  • Previous by thread: Re: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
  • Next by thread: RE: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread