• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?


  • Subject: Re: Kelvin Relevance in Fine Art?
  • From: email@hidden
  • Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:36:56 -0500

I agree with Doug - but can add that in my experience, if strobes are diffused enough - say white translucent plexiglas 12-18" square or other diffusion material - then the colors are much more true.
I'm speculating here, since I'm not a scientist, but i think there is a large ultraviolet component in the strobe light output and the dyes in the paint react with that. We have to remember that the film is also dyes that are subject to interpretation of "reality". I also feel that with Quartz lights as well you need to use some diffusion to avoid the penetrating effect of bare bulbs that render the paint differently than when viewed normally. Copy lighting is usually at 45 deg angle, but if the paintings are larger i would try to light them from each corner. I usually over-light the corners more than the middle - even the best lenses vignette slightly, especially larger formats. With film you need to do a test or two with different color correction filters, over the lights if you can, and see the film result before the color correction can be nailed. Once you have your formula it gets closer, but film processing, different emulsion# and voltage on Quartz lights may still necessitate a film color test, as close to the shoot time as practical. A tethered digital camera is a good option, since you can judge and measure the result on a profiled monitor during the shoot. With film, a slight overall color shift can of course be corrected after scanning. Even localized color correction is very possible....


Hope this helps - even if you knew it from before....

Ulf Skogsbergh

On Monday, February 7, 2005, at 11:28  PM, Doug Walker wrote:

On Monday, February 7, 2005, at 05:33  PM, Busher Jr Richard C wrote:

My question is, would I have been better off shooting with Quartz lights rather than strobes? Is there another light source available for photography that would be better?

Greetings Dick,

I have had the occasion to do quite a bit of strobe paintings early on and found that often paints exhibited a flourescing (magenta shift usually) and often exhibited the shift in hue you describe. Even with circular and light polarizers.

Yes. Known Tungsten bulbs and 64T solved the problem. The colors were much more accurate using this method. Aside from the longer exposures and occasional reciprocity woes. Continuous light source seems to be the key here. The colors may not be as punchy as you well know but they certainly don't dance around the CIE model as much.

But then you already knew all this didn't you. ;-)

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 50 (From: Doug Walker <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Working with labs
  • Next by Date: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 51
  • Previous by thread: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 50
  • Next by thread: LaCie photon20visionII
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread