RE: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 285
RE: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 285
- Subject: RE: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 285
- From: "Mark Rice" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:40:24 -0400
Visit http://www.zero1inc.com/Cautions_for_Press_Runs.htm
These images were from the same magazine - random copies of the same
magazine. I can't even figure out how the printer was able to create
something THIS BAD! If process controls are this far out of line, what is
the point of "fingerprinting" a press?
I will stick with proofs, which I know that I can control.
Mark Rice
www.zero1inc.com
On Jul 24, 2005, at 11:54 PM, email@hidden
wrote:
> no one should be trying to match a press - they should make a proof,
> and it
> is the printers job to match the proof
>C'mon, Mark. That is exactly the workflow that made color management
>necessary. Can you find one person who admits to making unmatchable
>proofs? Print buyers/creatives claim that their proofs are "accurate"
>yet they constantly complain that the printer doesn't match the proof.
>So who's right who's wrong?
>Rich Apollo
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden