• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Eyes versus instruments
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Eyes versus instruments


  • Subject: Re: Eyes versus instruments
  • From: Garth Fletcher <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 17:14:58 -0400
  • Organization: JacqCAD International (Fletcher Applied Sciences, Inc.)

Just to further confuse the issue, I believe there is data which
suggests that at lower brightnesses (e.g., museum lighting levels)
the rods come back into play and shift our color perceptions.

All the standard colorimetry pretty much assumes that only the cones
are in play - which is indeed the case under the conditions in which
they gathered the standard observer data, but may not be fully
accurate in dimmer viewing rooms.

I believe some museums have discovered that D50 looks very "cold"
rather than neutral under low lighting levels, and have shifted to
"warmer" lights (3400K, etc.) to achieve the neutral appearance
associated with D50 at higher illumination levels.

Very very complicated our eyes...
--
Garth Fletcher

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Eyes versus instruments
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Fooled by instrumentation
  • Next by Date: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 184
  • Previous by thread: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 184
  • Next by thread: Re: Eyes versus instruments
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread