> In theory I would have thought the greater the contrast ratio the better.
> However, looking at the Eizo range it seems to be quite the reverse, with
> the top of the line CG-220 weighing in at 400:1 and bottom of the line L768K
> claiming a confusing 1000:1.
>
Here’s a good article on the limited usefulness of the
contrast ratio figure:
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,110483,00.asp
Perhaps the differences in the Eizo models are due to
difference screens, or perhaps, as Roger suggested, simply marketing spiele for
different industries.
mike