efficient workflow and/or excellent photo quality? (Was Camera Profiling Software, Now Aperture)
efficient workflow and/or excellent photo quality? (Was Camera Profiling Software, Now Aperture)
- Subject: efficient workflow and/or excellent photo quality? (Was Camera Profiling Software, Now Aperture)
- From: Vidar Gundersen <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 20:59:35 +0200
- Mail-followup-to: email@hidden
===== Original message from edmund ronald | Wed, 26 Oct 2005:
> Aperture has incredibly good workflow. It's the best app for handling
> zillions of images at a time, and for versioning them. But unless
> Canon and Nikon and Sony are willing to cooperate to a degree they
> haven't done so far with Adobe, we won't see the best imagery from
> anything except the manufacturer's converter.
thank you for your support on my view.
it seems to me that photographers will have to make a choice
between time-saving workflow or excellent image quality.
is this "quality loss" also evident when transforming
proprietary RAW image files (CRW,NEF,..) into DNG?
kind regards,
Vidar Gundersen
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden