Re: Barco vs Eizo
Re: Barco vs Eizo
- Subject: Re: Barco vs Eizo
- From: bruce fraser <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 19:01:39 -0700
If you can get me a loan of a 2-nm spectroradiometer, I'll be happy
to get you numbers, but measuring on-screen color with the same
instrument used to calibrate and profile the display is akin to
pulling yourself off the ground by your shoelaces.
Rather than going by numbers that would have to be larded with so
many caveats to be meaningful that they wind up telling you nothing,
you'd be better off looking at the displays in question and trusting
the evidence of your senses (unless you do in fact have something at
least as accurate as a Minolta CA-1000, and preferably something a
lot more accurate).
Bruce
At 5:19 PM -0700 9/11/05, Busher Jr Richard C wrote:
Well! So far the commentary is what I thought it might be. No
quantitative data to contradict my comments.
Listen! I'm happy to spend the money if it will improve my business,
i.e. improve the accuracy of my contract proofs. I don't own stock
in Barco, and, in fact, they have stopped manufacturing crts. Those
of you out there who know me know that all I care about is producing
the best quality product for my clients that I possibly can. Is
there a flat screen display available that is more accurate than a
Barco? Numbers please! If it exists I will buy it.
To date I have read a lot of opinions, but no opinions backed up by data.
Dick Busher
Cosgrove Editions
email@hidden
888-507-7373
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
--
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden