RE: Barco vs Eizo
RE: Barco vs Eizo
- Subject: RE: Barco vs Eizo
- From: "Michael Fox Photography News Account" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:59:59 -0700
- Organization: Michael Fox Photography
>
> Or you can do like me and some others and trust your colorimeter to a
> reputable lab who *has* a CS-1000 and ask them to give you a correctino
> factor for LCDs and CRTs. That cost far less (about $600) than a CS-1000
> and
> is just as accurate, provided the measured spectrum bears any ressemblance
> to the ones that were used at the time to correct for your instrument.
>
I guess that's true enough if repeatability is high, i.e. the instrument
doesn't drift. But I've read that at least one popular spectro, the eyeOne
Pro, does have quite a bit of drift, especially when measuring emissive
values in the darker end of the range. Evidently, the instrument will drift
enough during the time you are calibrating and profiling the monitor that
the resulting shadow values can be significantly off, compared to the
results from other devices.
I don't have the instruments to measure such things but perhaps someone here
could comment on this?
Michael
------------
Michael Fox Photography - Fine Art Nature Photography
http://www.michaelfoxphoto.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden