Re: Barco vs Eizo
Re: Barco vs Eizo
- Subject: Re: Barco vs Eizo
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:00:38 -0400
> I guess that's true enough if repeatability is high, i.e. the instrument
> doesn't drift. But I've read that at least one popular spectro, the eyeOne
> Pro, does have quite a bit of drift, especially when measuring emissive
> values in the darker end of the range. Evidently, the instrument will drift
> enough during the time you are calibrating and profiling the monitor that
> the resulting shadow values can be significantly off, compared to the
> results from other devices.
>
> I don't have the instruments to measure such things but perhaps someone here
> could comment on this?
>
> Michael
I have not made longitudinal study of the stability of my regular emissive
instruments including EyeOnePro and Optix and DTP92s and Spyder2 and
Spectrocam. But I trust that I won't have to revisit my CS-100 for drift too
often.
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >RE: Barco vs Eizo (From: "Michael Fox Photography News Account" <email@hidden>) |