• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Barco vs Eizo
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Barco vs Eizo


  • Subject: Re: Barco vs Eizo
  • From: <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:09:50 -0400

Michael,

I would like to see serious data validating this claim of drift. This "conclusion" could happened if:

1- Someone measures a dark color at two locations on a monitor and the values differs. Artisan, Eizo and the like show a good uniformity (about 2 DeltaE*ab according to many) but most standard monitors are not that good.

2- Any measurement on a CRT (a lot less for LCD) is influenced by ambient lighting that comes from the thick CRT glass. Similarly, if a dark color is adjacent to a bright color, there will be contamination (also a lot less for a LCD).

3- CRTs and LCDs do drift in light output from the time of startup. The stabilisation time is from 30 minutes to over an hour depending on models.

These phenomena could be associated to spectrometer "drift" but are only due to "experimental conditions". All of these can easily be verified with careful measurements.

Roger,

The answer you got from GMB makes sense since you only need the dark current, which is calibrated each time you need to use the Eye-One in emission or ambient mode, and the response of the detectors as measured in reflectance.
I suspect the only reason for reflectance calibration during normal operation is to compensate for the illumination (the tungsten lamp), not for the detectors response which is burned-in during factory recal (and associated with the white tile).


Danny Pascale

email@hidden
www.BabelColor.com

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:17:50 -0400
 Roger Breton <email@hidden> wrote:
Therefore, if the EyeOne Pro
displays significant drift in the shadow areas, then this could explain the
problem that the other individual was having.


Michael

I don't have specific evidence about the EyeOnePro 'drifting' in the
shadows, in emissive measurements, but I can tell you that when
re-calibrating these instruments, only the reflectance part is covered.
That's what GMB told me. That sounds so unlikely to me but, to date, I still
don't know how they do it, if at all, in emissive mode.


Roger Breton  |  Laval, Canada  |  email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • RE: Barco vs Eizo
      • From: "Michael Fox Photography News Account" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Barco vs Eizo (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Kodak ColorFlow Custom Color Tools 3.1
  • Next by Date: Re: Instruments and models Vs. Accuracy
  • Previous by thread: Re: Barco vs Eizo
  • Next by thread: RE: Barco vs Eizo
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread