Re: gamma 1.8 or 2.2
Re: gamma 1.8 or 2.2
- Subject: Re: gamma 1.8 or 2.2
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:46:10 -0700
In a message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:39:35, Roger Breton wrote:
> There is also an L* opto-electronics function that is starting to
> pick momentum among color management circles but you certainly don't go
> wrong with 2.2.
I strongly and enthusiastically vouch for the use of L* in monitor
calibration and profiling. I am getting outstanding profiles using L*: long,
even grayscale gradations with neglectable color seepage, very good detail
in shadows and highlights, excellent neutrality.
Kudos to Karl Koch for his very good work.
--------------
Marco Ugolini
Mill Valley, CA
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden