• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Government standards
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Government standards


  • Subject: Re: Government standards
  • From: Ernst Dinkla <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:53:40 +0200





Mark Rice wrote:
 Presently the government Bureau of Standards keeps a constant index of what
the "meter" is, and what a "second" is, and they do a pretty good job. Are
you implying that private industry, such is Microsoft, or Apple, could do a
better job of defining these standards?

In the USA it looks like the industry sets the standards independently. Mothball archiving of standards by the government doesn't really help. Those nice leaflets on metrification issued since the 1950's are no real attempt to change the industry. The 1/72 inch for font sizes contradicts any set standard in the world including the US standard but it dominates today's prepress since IBM used that size for their desktop composers. The US paper sizes - weights are a PITA for the entire continent. A mission to Mars ended in infinity because Lockheed and NASA couldn't use a single unit system. In general I get the impression that US citizens not only pay dearly for the haphazard use of imperial and metric units but they also find it difficult to do arithmetics in both systems. Whether that is the objective of the industry I'm not sure but it wouldn't surprise me. Proprietary isn't a dirty word in the US, the abuse of the patent system today is just one symptom, the rate of metrification so far is another one.

On topic:

Microsoft did time its announcement well. Apple's change to
Intel hardware is as risky as the change from 68000>PowerPC
was. At that time M$ had W95 to attract Apple customers, this
time it could be a better than Apple's CMS and having PS run
natively. That's probably Adobe's main concern now, get PS
running on Intel-OS X in time. Not for the volume in sales but
with M$ trying to get into other parts of Adobe's market it is
nice to have another platform to build on. Apple could do
itself and Adobe a favor by decoupling hardware and software
soon and reinvent Colorsync in the process. I do not believe
it will harm their hardware and iPod activities if they keep
their designs at the usual level.


-- Ernst Dinkla


www.pigment-print.com ( unvollendet ) _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Prev by Date: Re: Profiling LCD projection systems with a Spyder2?
  • Next by Date: Re: Microsoft vs. ICC
  • Previous by thread: Re: Government standards
  • Next by thread: Re: Profiling LCD projection systems
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread