RE: Microsoft's color-management claims
RE: Microsoft's color-management claims
- Subject: RE: Microsoft's color-management claims
- From: "Stan Kouchnarev" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:08:37 -0700
- Thread-topic: Microsoft's color-management claims
Hi Marco,
They can work from XYZ and working (I have couple of such profiles created by Fuji and Adobe), just it's not adding any benefits to do so, even it will introduce additional problems, because of ununiformity of XYZ.
Thanks,
Stan.
Creo Inc., a Subsidiary of Kodak
-----Original Message-----
From: colorsync-users-bounces+skouchnarev=email@hidden [mailto:colorsync-users-bounces+skouchnarev=email@hidden]On Behalf Of Marco Ugolini
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:58 PM
To: Bruce Fraser; ColorSync Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Microsoft's color-management claims
In a message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:39:46, Bruce Fraser wrote:
>> By the way, here comes my turn for "stupid question time": why can't ICC
>> profiles work from XYZ values instead of CIELAB, as they do now?
>
> Stupid factoid time: All matrix ICC profiles use XYZ as PCS. It's
> only LUT-based profiles that use Lab.
You are right. I posed my question incorrectly.
What I EXACTLY meant to ask was "why can't ICC LUT profiles work from XYZ
values instead of CIELAB, as they do now."
And even put this way, my question may still be no less stupid...
--------------
Marco Ugolini
Mill Valley, CA
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden