• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Microsoft's color-management claims
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Microsoft's color-management claims


  • Subject: Re: Microsoft's color-management claims
  • From: Robin Myers <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:11:23 -0700


On Sep 22, 2005, at 8:57 PM, Graeme Gill wrote:

<snip>


The earliest version of ColorSync was based on color equations, XYZ matrix equations, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ColorSync> rather than LUTs. However, as the story goes, it was converted to a LUT-based system to allow peripheral manufacturers to differentiate their product lines.


Not a very likely story. Matrix based profiles only work on devices
that have additive behaviour (essentially the colorants don't interfere
with each other). Practically no subtractive devices (such as printers)
behave this way, so matrix profiles work really badly for them. LUT
based profiles on the other hand, are very general, and will work OK
to very well on almost any sort of device.





Dear Mr. Gill,

As the inventor of the algorithms that formed the basis for ColorSync 1, I can assure you that the algorithms were matrix based and worked extremely well on subtractive printers. In fact, for in gamut colors, I was able to achieve very accurate colorimetric matches (within the measurement error of my spectrometers and the printer tolerance). All the calculations were performed with XYZ data. The algorithms also handled seven colorant printers, and had a mechanism for gamut mapping and primary adjustments such as adjusting the yellow colorant so there would be no scum dots in the pure yellows (at the expense of some colorimetric accuracy). The final ColorSync 1 release unfortunately did not have these features and was restricted to a 4 colorant printer model only.

When the ICC was formed it was decided not to unveil the algorithms I invented but to work with the ICC to develop a LUT system. I do not believe that the reason cited above was the determining factor for the ICC using LUTs. More likely a LUT system was chosen because LUTs were well understood by the members of the ICC and they already had functioning LUT color matching solutions they could quickly convert to use ICC based profiles. LUTs also allow for very non-linear behavior to be encapsulated easily.

Robin Myers
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Microsoft's color-management claims
      • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: NEC SpectraView II (From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Microsoft's color-management claims (From: Tim Vitale <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Microsoft's color-management claims (From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft's color-management claims
  • Next by Date: Poll: "Old" G4 with Tiger & CS2 installed : How should it work?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft's color-management claims
  • Next by thread: Re: Microsoft's color-management claims
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread