Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Absolute vs. Relative rendering intent while proofing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Absolute vs. Relative rendering intent while proofing

Subject: Re: Absolute vs. Relative rendering intent while proofing
From: Thomas Holm/pixl <email@hidden>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:09:27 +0200


On 20/04/2006, at 20.32, Steve Obermiller wrote:

I've recently run into a roadblock regarding absolute rendering when proofing. We are currently proofing with absolute rendering intent using US Web Coated SWOP with an edited white point to simulate our house stock.

Did you tinker with lightness (which might kill details) or just chroma when editing the whitepoint? You did edit the Lab > Cmyk portion of the simulation profile, right?

Best Regards

Thomas Holm / Pixl Aps

- Colour Management Consultant
- Seminars speaker and tutor on CM and Digital Imaging etc.
- Apple Solutions Expert
- Member, ColorManagementGroup.com

- www.pixl.dk · email@hidden
--

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Absolute vs. Relative rendering intent while proofing (From: Steve Obermiller <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: I've just been going through the exercise of trying to profile an Epson R1800

Next by Date:
Printer recommendation

Previous by thread:
Re: Absolute vs. Relative rendering intent while proofing

Next by thread:
Re: Absolute vs. Relative rendering intent while proofing

Index(es):

Date
Thread