Re: Aperture
Re: Aperture
- Subject: Re: Aperture
- From: Pete Carter <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:11:56 +0100
- Thread-topic: Aperture
Sorry its off topic but,
Seem to remember Final Cut was developed by Macromedia..?
The problem I seem to be seeing is the Photographers I know
don't want to commit to Aperture because of its shakey start and
uncertain future. Its a big deal totally changing your workflow from
something that you use and are familiar with day to day.
There seems to be a 'Ill hang on and see what happens' feel
around the place.
iPhoto with stacking? yes please!
Pete
> From: Roberto Michelena <email@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:30:23 -0500
> To: <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Aperture
>
>> Every single
>> successful "Pro" creative app that Apple has to its name was developed
>> elsewhere and climbed to the top of the market over a course of years on its
>> own merits before Apple bought it.
>
> You can't say that about Final Cut Pro, which incidentally is *the*
> most successful of such "Pro" applications considering it only runs on
> the Macintosh platform.
> Apple bought it before it's debut.
>
> -- Roberto Michelena
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >Re: Aperture (From: "Roberto Michelena" <email@hidden>) |