Yes, I understand. The MP linearization *does not* change the way the
RIP/deivce prints prior to profiling in the same way that a printer's
or RIP's linearization does. MP's "linearization" is just used to
create a customized target for that device. This is why I think it is
dangerous to call it a linearization. If we call it "linearization"
then people like Darren understandably worry about double linearizing
the device which they needn't be concerned about. I don't know where
this pre-lin term came from but, if anything it should be considered
a post-lin or pre-profile step.