Re: Big problems using Bill Atkinssons new Eye-1 profiles
Re: Big problems using Bill Atkinssons new Eye-1 profiles
- Subject: Re: Big problems using Bill Atkinssons new Eye-1 profiles
- From: Jim Rich <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 16:40:03 -0500
- Thread-topic: Big problems using Bill Atkinssons new Eye-1 profiles
I am curious to end-users who are doing the RGB workflow thing.... is there
that much (if any) of a performance hit with using the GMB RGB 918 chart vs
a chart with a higher patch count?
And if there are claims that a higher patch set does produce a better
result, is there hard scientific evidence to support that claim?
Of is a higher patch just something that seems like the right thing to do
but only a few end-users have tried it with mixed success?
Jim Rich
On 2/5/06 4:20 PM, "Sören" <email@hidden> wrote:
> I have tried using Bills new testcharts for printer profiling.
> I have been using the "RGB 4096 Eye-one Target"(4 pages) without any
> success.
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden