• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Monaco vs. Gretag Neutrals Analysis
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Monaco vs. Gretag Neutrals Analysis


  • Subject: Re: Monaco vs. Gretag Neutrals Analysis
  • From: Troy Buccini <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:07:39 -0600

Hi Michael,

I have tried Dan's method for ink limiting and can assure you it is the best way to get lower L*'s, cleaner neutrals, and over better color matches. 360 seems really high for an ink limit on a Matte paper. I am not sure what RIP you are using, but my experience for getting the lowest L* without sacrificing gamut is around 330 and lower for a microporous paper. matte papers will always take less ink. Up your resolutions and your TIL will need even lower numbers. Actually another thing to look at is to see if your 2-3 color ink limits are too high. Again each RIP does this slightly different, but if you are using Epson UC inks, they are somewhat predictable. Yellow is always way to strong and Magenta is usually pegged because it is not really magenta it is blueish until it hits maximum limit.

Monaco and PM are were not built specifically for this ink set. Therefore, proper inklimits and custom charts will help tremendously. You might even be somewhat happy with PM's inkjet 260 default. Now with that said I wish the manufacturers would publish best practices for these printers as they are somewhat of the defacto for Proofing and Fine Art.

Thanks,
Troy
On Jan 5, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Michael Fox Photography News Account wrote:

Hmmm.

The profiling software should ignore color patches that have a higher total
ink build than what is called for in the total ink user input field so it
shouldn't matter how much higher the RIP total ink limit is set. Right?


Michael

________________________________________
From: Dan Reid [mailto:email@hidden]

Well the profiling app is telling you have too much ink which is why it's
building it at much less than your RIP ink limit. You may look at reducing
your ink limit at the RIP and you might find the shadow reversals (too much
ink) go away. 360% is a lot of ink on paper so you must either A) have a
super coated stock and/or B) not using a high printer resolution which would
put down twice as much ink.
I determine the sweet spot for RIP ink limit by evaluating different ink
limit settings in ColorShop X. Look for the darkest L* and that's where you
should set your ink limit. Use the same ink limit setting in reducing your
profiling chart ink coverage.
- Dan



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40yahoo.com


This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • RE: Monaco vs. Gretag Neutrals Analysis
      • From: "Michael Fox Photography News Account" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >RE: Monaco vs. Gretag Neutrals Analysis (From: "Michael Fox Photography News Account" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: On SpectraView 2180WG LCD
  • Next by Date: Re: On SpectraView 2180WG LCD
  • Previous by thread: RE: Monaco vs. Gretag Neutrals Analysis
  • Next by thread: RE: Monaco vs. Gretag Neutrals Analysis
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread