RE: CIECAM in the CMM
RE: CIECAM in the CMM
- Subject: RE: CIECAM in the CMM
- From: "Peter MacLeod" <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:32:43 -0800
- Thread-topic: CIECAM in the CMM
Roger Breton wrote:
>Whoever does it best deserves to become the king of the hill. No? If
>Microsoft is building an advanced CIECAM system into Windows, even though
>its their own flavor, and the implementation is well done, then they deserve
>market leadership, no question; doesn't everyone want what works best, do we
>know many clients in these days of intense print competion, who can afford
>NOT to have the best color appearance matching technology? Apple publically
>stated their intention at the last GATF Color Management Conference NOT to
>embrace CIECAM, perhaps out of stubborness. But that does not mean "the rest
>of us" have to stand by the wayside while Microsoft pass us by at supersonic
>speed.
I'm curious--what problems do you have that having a CIECAM model in the
CMM (as opposed to using it when creating profiles) would solve? Would being
able to change appearance attributes at render-time be a useful thing, and how
would you use it? What sorts of controls would you expect to see?
Thanks,
Peter
<<winmail.dat>>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden